March 8, 2024

Port Angeles City Council Restricts Rights In Favor Of Migrunts

The Port Angeles City Council got what they had coming to them and that was angry voters.

The most lunatic liberal Council in Port Angeles history had tried to once again control private property by restricting to who and whom a private property owner can rent his or her property but property owners took a stand and took it to the lunatics of whom still approved an Ordinance that would cap whole house STRs at 200.

The recent vote however included a priority system for those currently compliant with location-based zones and a "lottery system" that will be implemented Aug. 1

This is called a, "compromise.”

Lunatics like this Council Member Amy Miller said “I don’t like it, I’m not happy with it, but I also think that you aren’t happy with it. “I really do feel this is meeting in the middle.”

Sounds like East Coast talk when a Trillion dollar spending bill is about to be approved.

This Lindsey Schromen-Wawrin, whom also led the efforts against all property rights had also said, however, “I think this is giving away the city to Airbnb.” Gee, how dare private industry make money.

Charmin Warmer was at my door during his last campaign, not by choice, he was not aware it was my home but when questioned had also said, of which I have a full and lawful audio recording, that he, “does not work for the voters, taxpayers, his job is protecting The Council and City Staff.

This can be evidenced in the most recent suits against it’s City Staff of which Charmin Warmer, in his capacity as an attorney and Council Member, has never even spoken out over the clearly apparent violations committed by Staff regarding their Statutory Duties, The PRA, RCW 42.56 and criminally.

Administration, Manager West, Staff Attorneys and City Clerk Martinez-Bailey, intercept and open private communications, emails, emails including those sent to the individual Council Members to spy and snoop but of which also vilolates RCW 9.73.

Enforcement details were not provided in the event a property owner violates the restrictions now placed on property rights nor are any enforcement mechanisms provided in Ordinances or Statutes for "staff" to "unilaterally" and "subjectively," restrict rights under The PRA absent a clear disruption.

O'Dea v. City of Tacoma, 493 P.3d 1245, 1252 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021)

"No official format is required for making a records request; however, agencies may recommend that requestors submit requests using an agency provided form or web page." RCW 42.56.080(2). A requester need not expressly reference the PRA. Germeau , 166 Wash. App. at 806, 271 P.3d 932. Nor must a requester submit their request to a designated PRA coordinator. Id. at 806 n.17, 271 P.3d 932.

**And, although the requests did not arrive through the City's online PRA submission form, agencies cannot mandate a particular mode of submission. RCW 42.56.080(2) ; Germeau , 166 Wash. App. at 806 n.17, 271 P.3d 932.

“As our Supreme Court has made clear, “[T]here is no official format for a valid P[R]A request.” Hangartner, 151 Wash.2d at 447, 90 P.3d 26; see also Beal, 150 Wash.App. at 874, 877, 209 P.3d 872.” Germeau v. Mason Cnty., 271 P.3d 932, 941 n.17 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012

March 8, 2024 5:02am